☛ Want the latest procurement and supply chain news delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for the Supply Management Daily
28 September 2011 | Angeline Albert
Fewer than half of buyers have plans to improve
pre-qualification questionnaires (PQQs), despite recent criticism that they are
too lengthy.
Willie Watt, a
partner at architects Nicoll Russell, recently said PQQs in the construction industry should be limited to 12 questions. He’s not the first to criticise form filling required at the start of the
procurement process and call for simplification, particularly to help smaller
suppliers access deals.
The SM100 poll question this month asked buyers if their
organisation is looking to improve its PQQ process. While 57 per cent said it
was not on their organisation’s horizon, 43 per cent said changes were taking
place.
Helen Baker, head of procurement at the University of the
West of England, said: “If you have 70 architects responding to a PQQ, then 12
questions would be insufficient to get all of the information you need to get
to a sensible number of suppliers to tender.”
And Tony Hall, head of Welland Procurement said shorter PQQs
may lengthen the overall process as purchasers sought to get the information
they need at a later stage. “If the industry wants shorter PQQs, they must
realise that will mean having to go to the expense of producing an increased
number of tender submissions and extended lead times.”
Many buyers said PQQs should be continually reviewed and
they had already revised theirs in line with the UK government’s standard
Publicly Available Specification (PAS 91) for construction.
Stuart Crawley, group head of procurement at the Sanctuary
Group said the length of a PQQ depends on need. He said: “It’s those that churn
out the same PQQs regardless that are tarring the rest of the profession with a
poor image.”
Martin Wakelin, purchasing director at Global Elastomers,
Trelleborg Sealing Solutions said: “We've recently been through a
simplification process because an over-complicated pre-bid questionnaire was
seen as both difficult to use by buyers and a barrier to entry by some
suppliers. Without customisation you could over-simplify a tender and risk not
comparing suppliers on a level playing field.”