[Skip to content]

Supply Management logo

The purchasing and supply website

.

MP warns Department of Health to hold-off awarding IT contracts

Advertisement

21 January 2011 | Lindsay Clark

The Departmentof Health (DH) should wait for the results of independent reports before concluding contract renegotiations with two high-profile IT suppliers.

Conservative MP Richard Bacon, a member of the Committee of Public Accounts (PAC), has written to Christine Connelly, the department’s chief information officer for health, advising contract renegotiations with suppliers to the troubled National Programme for IT (NPfIT) in the NHS should not be finished until the National Audit Office (NAO) has completed its third report on the programme and the PAC has had a chance to consider the findings.

The NPfIT was launched in 2003 was expected to spend around £12 billion on systems including integrated electronic health records for around 50 million people in England. The programme has fallen years behind schedule, even though delivery organisation NHS Connecting for Health had insisted suppliers would not get paid until health trusts accepted systems. The government cancelled the scheme last September, although some of the projects will continue.

In his letter to Connelly, Bacon urged the DH not to award renegotiated deals with two major suppliers to the programme, CSC and BT, until value for money had been considered by the NAO.

“I would suggest that this inquiry will review a great deal of evidence that is relevant to the question of whether proposed contract renegotiations with BT and CSC really do represent good value to the NHS and taxpayers,” the letter said.

“I would therefore ask for your undertaking that no further steps will be taken to conclude further agreements with either company until the NAO has reported and the Public Accounts Committee has had time to consider its findings. It would seem to me that to enter into new irrevocable commitments in advance of this report would be irresponsible and potentially a breach of the accounting officer’s responsibilities.”

A spokesman for the DH said it was considering its response to the letter.

The NAO will publish its value for money report on the NPfIT in March.

Configure your Portal

  • Main (left)
Configuration
WHITEPAPER:
"Putting Down a Marker"
PMMS "Putting down a marker" whitepaper cover
REPORT: "Guide to Salaries 2013"
Michael Page salary survey 2013 cover
INFOGRAPHIC
"Business Traveller Report 2012"
Egencia-Business Traveller Report 2012 - Infographic - banner
CPO Agenda logo
Live Webinar series. Click here for sponsorship opportunities.
Interserve
"How to add value to FM procurement"
Click here to watch the webinar

The winners of the CIPS Supply Management Awards 2012 have been announced. Click here to find out who was victorious and click here to watch video interviews with the winners.

Buyography blog logo
  • How to be the best in show
    Alison Smith looks at what procurement professionals could learn from Chelsea Flower Show designers. 21 May 2013
PMI reports logo

Check out the latest commodity prices.

View latest prices

  • Main (right)
Configuration
REPORT:
"A Guide to Contract Management"
Bravo - A guide to contract management image
WHITE PAPER:
"Ten Strategies for Best-in-Class Public Sector Procurement"
top 10 strategies
WHITE PAPER:
"Value Creation: The EIPM Surfboard Shop":

EIPM - Surfboard Shop whitepaper cover
WHITE PAPER
"Global Travel Forecast: A Guide for Pricing and Negotiation in 2013"
Egencia button
WHITE PAPER:
"Forrester Research - Economic Benefits of Supplier Information Management Solution 2012"
Forrester Report
Q & A icon

Need advice on a procurement & supply chain or work-related matter?

Click here to get free expert advice.

Comments
Please enter your comments below
Fill out the all the boxes and click the 'Submit comments' button to make a comment on this page
*Comments are added to the bottom of the page. They are moderated and will not be published until approved by the Supply Management team. They may be edited. Please note unless marked “confidential” your feedback may be published on our letters page