[Skip to content]

Supply Management logo

The purchasing and supply website

.

Australian department fails to meet own procurement compliance rules

Advertisement

Want the latest procurement and supply chain news delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for the Supply Management Daily


17 August 2011 | Angeline Albert

The Australian government’s spending watchdog has been criticised for not following its own purchasing compliance rules over a nine-month period.

An internal audit, made public this month following a freedom of information request, has revealed the government’s Departmentof Finance and Deregulation failed to meet its own compliance rules in 19 procurements out of a sample of 27 that occurred between 1 July 2009 and 31 March 2010.

The report by PricewaterhouseCoopers, which focused on purchasing operations at the government department, found procurement processes did not encourage competition in accordance with Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines (CPGs and Operational Government Rule 4.3 (OG 4.3)) issued by the department.

Issues discovered included poor value for money, poor risk assessments and discrimination based on location.

The report said finance officers were unclear about direct procurements, uncertain about the requirements for completing self assessments for procurements valued below AUD $80,000 (£51,283), and there was the potential that finance “may not be able to successfully defend a challenge to a procurement process, due to insufficient documentation”. Auditors said buyers needed to “read up and follow the department’s guidance for procurement”.  

The report said: “A supplier’s location cannot be a factor in a procurement decision and therefore should not be referred to in procurement documentation.”

Auditors said approval documentation for the 24th procurement was non-compliant because it included the statement: “UNIFY Solutions Pty Ltd are therefore the only organisation in the Canberra region that can effectively and efficiently provide support services…”.

In addition, 17 of the 27 procurements tested were inaccurately reported on AusTender, the government procurement portal. Auditors recommended compliance education for finance staff for future procurements, including clarity on the importance of encouraging competition and reporting accurate information on AusTender.

A spokesman for the Department of Finance and Deregulation said: “The vast majority of findings related to non compliance with internal guidance, and are not breaches of the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 or the CPGs.

“We have initiated a procurement process improvement project to update guidance and templates, and are reviewing training and communication of this material to help staff follow internal guidance. The department has also recently introduced a Basic Contract Documentation Suite to assist all agencies procure low-risk, low-value contracts up to $80,000. This will help improve compliance.”

Configure your Portal

  • Main (left)
Configuration
CIPS SM Awards Logo 2012

The deadline to enter this year's CIPS Supply Management Awards has now passed. The shortlist of nominations will be announced on 21 June.

Click here for details of how to book your table.
WHITE PAPER


"Shape up with NRI - prepare and plan your negotiations better"

Reading Lines
Buyography blog logo
PMI reports logo

Check out the latest commodity prices.

View latest prices

  • Main (right)
Configuration
WHITE PAPER:
"Top Ten Technologies - Industry Report"
Top 10 Tech Supply Management_UK
WHITE PAPER:
"Driving Lasting Savings with Spend Compliance"
lasting savings
SAP

FREE WEBINAR


"Practical steps to strategic sourcing"

Click here to view the webinar

Q & A icon

Need advice on a procurement & supply chain or work-related matter?

Click here to get free expert advice.

Comments
Please enter your comments below
Fill out the all the boxes and click the 'Submit comments' button to make a comment on this page
*Comments are added to the bottom of the page. They are moderated and will not be published until approved by the Supply Management team. They may be edited. Please note unless marked “confidential” your feedback may be published on our letters page